Hey @NathanLunar and the rest of the @LunarStrategy team,
I can relate to some of the things mentioned by @madeafterdeath and @ayseguls above. But let me add my own sauce as well.
Looking back, I think we spread things out too much. And we could’ve been more focused.
- Less KOLs, but have them talk about DappRadar and use DappRadar for a couple of months
- Less talking points / topics, but more focused communication
If we would have that, we also need to make the extra step in our KPIs. Reach or views are weak performance indicators that can easily be botted. When we have less talking points and more focused comms, we can move the reach / views towards a landing page, and measure the traffic there.
This traffic can then be converted into a PRO member, or registered user.
Reach > Views > Clicks / CTR > Registered User > PRO member
These first 3 steps would be Lunar Strategy’s responsibility, and the last two ones would be for DappRadar.
–
Did everything go wrong? No, not at all. We had some success, especially with the PR stuff we did around DappLaunch. And Lunar Strategy has been a strong support in the launch of DappLaunch, in getting partnerships in, and various other areas.
They’ve done some great work for the DappRadar brand over the past 4 months. And I am grateful for their efforts.
But I also realize things could’ve been better. This is not only on the side of Lunar, but also on the side of DappRadar. To an extend, it feels like this growth marketing collaboration was a bit of an extension of the DappRadar platform itself: too many options, too much functionality, and then having difficulty to communicate about it.
PRO membership? DappLaunch? Quests? Airdrop Explorer? Rankings? Or new chain integrations? On a regular day there’s already so much being built. And we want to talk about it all.
I think the lesson learned should be K.I.S.S.